One perspective, by E.A. Zimmerman
Are House Sparrows “evil?” My website includes a compilation of information on passive and active means to manage House Sparrow (HOSP) populations to enable bluebirds to survive and thrive. It also contains anecdotal accounts of the threat that HOSP can pose to native birds. Does this mean that I think HOSP are bad or even evil?
It is tempting to anthropomorphize (ascribe human characteristics to) animals. In an attempt to understand them, we draw parallels between animals and humans. They provoke emotional responses in us. People may experience anger, horror, disgust, anxiety, disappointment and/or sadness upon witnessing the results of a HOSP attack. This can motivate a desire to take action or retaliate. In part to justify our actions and assuage guilt or discomfort, or even to feel morally superior, we may tend to demonize HOSP as vicious or spiteful “murderers.”
There is debate on whether animals experience what we call emotions such as anger. (94% of pet owners think they experience emotions, according to a2004 survey by the American Animal Hospital Association.) We doknow that different species display different behaviors. This behaviormay be genetically selected for (like a built in “behavioral template”),enabling one species or strain to survive.
An example is the territorial or possessive behaviorexhibited by birds such as the House Sparrow and House Wren. Boththese species commonly attack the nests and eggs of other cavity-nesting birds. HOSP will also attack adults, perhaps out of an instinctivedrive to reduce competition for nesting sites or food. Supportingevidence for this theory would be instances where HOSP drive otherbirds away from a nestbox, even though the HOSP already have anexisting nest nearby, or when they then do not choose to occupythe box they have “liberated.”
However, HOSP, which are communal birds, do not typically attack each others nests, although they may kill another HOSP when confined together in a trap. Female HOSP usurping the nest of another HOSP regularly commit infanticide (Veiga, 2004). Unlike birds like bluejays that actually eat eggs and nestlings, HOSP aggression is not directly motivated by pursuit of food.
Scientists (e.g., Moyer, 1968 and Paul Brain, 1979) have identified other types and motivations for aggression, such as:
- predatory aggression (induced by stimuli instead of hunger)
- inter-male/dominance/social aggression (competition for reproductive success which may be influenced by hormones)
- fear-induced or self-defense aggression (e.g., reaction to being confined/cornered)
- irritable aggression, and
- protective/maternal defense.
Not all HOSP will always behave the same way. Behavior may be influenced by sex, age, environment, residency, competition, season, and climate. Individuals have different temperaments or dispositions. Some individuals or populations are more tenacious or aggressive than others. Different birds may protect different size territories. It’s possible that reduced HOSP populations may reduce intra-species competition, resulting in less-hostile HOSP.
HOSP may nest in evergreens alongside robins and mourning doves, apparently without conflict. Keith Kridler reported a pair of bluebirds that successfuly fledged young in a multi-compartment box right next to a House Sparrow nest. There is more visible aggression and possessiveness associated with nestboxes, possibly because of desirability (protection from elements etc.), supply and demand, and confined space.
Aggressive behavior can be reinforcedvia learning through experience or observation. HOSP areconsidered intelligent (in the sense that they can learnquickly) and adaptable, which has probably aided their proliferation.
Individual birds also occasionally exhibit abnormal behavior which could be associated with what we characterize in humans as mental illness. For example, captive parrots raised in a barren environment may exhibit abnormal behavior such as plucking out all their feathers.
So do I think HOSP are evil? No. The term “evil” generallyimplies morally bad, wrong, wicked, or acting out of anger or spite. It is a term applicable to humans. I do NOT believe that HOSP, either as a species or as individuals,are “bad” and bluebirds are “good.” I believe HOSP behaviors have evolved or are learned as an effective means of self-preservation for individuals and the species. They are doing what comes naturally, and cannot be held to some “humane” human standard. That said, cats are also behaving naturally when they kill birds, but that does not mean I would allow a cat to run loose outdoors and kill wildlife.
I do know that:
- Bluebirds are native. Their populations have been seriously impacted by human activity (habitat loss, pesticide use, and introduction of HOSPs and starlings.) HOSP are not native.
- Bluebirds’ impact on human crops, if any, ispositive as their diet is primarily insects and non-crop fruits.In part because of sheer numbers, House Sparrows can significantly damage crops,livestock food and water, etc.
- Bluebirds only nest in cavities (natural or nestboxes). HOSP may prefer cavities, but will nest in many other protected places like gutters, signs and evergreens.
- Some HOSP may ignore other birds, others may simply harass them to prevent successful nesting, while others will kill.
- Aggressive HOSP behavior can cause injury and destruction to native birds. It can significantly impact bluebird survival and reproductive success.
I recognize that some people enjoy HOSP. They are popular birdsin Europe (where bluebirds do not exist.) Some find them clever,cute, and comical. People appreciate the fact that HOSP are familiarand friendly towards humans. They enjoy watching HOSP at a birdfeederor in a city environment, where they tend to be ubiquitous becausethey are so hardy and competitive.
As noted above, in some areas HOSP and native cavity nesters appear to peacefullycoexist. This may be due to a less aggressive population, or HOSPthat have not become accustomed to using nestboxes. I wonder whetherthis situation would change when HOSP populationsincrease or if HOSP learned to utilize nestboxes which offerbetter protection from weather and predators.
In closing, I do not “hate” HOSP, althoughI am very concerned about their impact. I try to be objective about HOSP, but I am not dispassionate about conservation.
The bottom line is that I have made a personal choice to help bluebird populations increase. I do not believe HOSP require such assistance. Humans were responsible forintroducing HOSP to this continent. I think it is necessary to try torestore a degree of balance to the ecosystem which has been upsetby this human intervention. I am motivated by a sense of responsibilityassociated with attempting to attract bluebirds to my area. Thus,I feel compelled to do what I can to protect native birds thatmay want to nest in my boxes.
- Why We Get Goopy Over Bluebirds by E.A. Zimmerman
- When HOSP Attack by E.A. Zimmerman
- HOSP History by E.A. Zimmerman
- Video Clip of HOSP Attack
- Essay on Population, Thomas Malthus (1798)
- A Dozen Bluebirding Myths by E.A. Zimmerman
- Behavioral Enrichment for Birds in Captivity by Bryan Shao-Chang Wee
- House Sparrow Revenge Syndrome, by Steve Kroenke. (Note: some dispute the existence of this behavior.)
- When Elephants Weep: The Emotional Lives ofAnimals by Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson, Susan McCarthy – an interestingperspective
- The Animals Among Us: Wildlife in the Cityby John McLoughlin, with a chapter on HOSP
- BirdBrains: The Intelligence of Crows, Ravens, Magpies, andJays by Candace Savage
- Providence of a Sparrow, Lessons from a Life Gone to the Birds by Chris Chester, about adopting an injuredHOSP
- Replacement female HOSP regularly commit infanticide, Veiga, 2004
- The definition of evil: Maimonides (a 12th century thinker) cautioned that our judgement of what quailfies as “evil” is often remarkably self-centered. If something does nto fit our personal desires or interests, we immediately condemn it as evil, as if eveything is all about us.
- Weisheit A.S. and Creighton PD, Interference of House Sparrows in Nesting Activities of Barn Swallows, Journal of Field Ornithology, Vol.60, No.3 (Summer, 1989), pp 323-328.
- This paper noted that nest destruction can beneift the aggressor if they usurp nests, or have access to more desirable nest sites. Destruction of eggs and nestlings can reduce competitors. But sometimes HOSP apparently enjoy no benefits of interference.
– Larry H. Joplin, 2004